Containment lines, PODs and suppression success: a case study of the 2021 Schneider Springs Fire

Background

Wildfire suppression is shaped by a complex interplay of environmental conditions, resource allocation and management strategies.

Aims

Examining the containment of the 2021 Schneider Springs Fire in the Eastern Cascades of Washington State, USA, we emphasise critical roles of variable selection, representative sampling and suppression-specific factors.

Methods

Using descriptive, predictive and causal models, we assessed the influence of weather conditions, terrain features, personnel availability, tree canopy cover, fire containment lines, and previously identified ‘best available’ containment features.

Key results

High vapour pressure deficit and strong winds were consistently associated with declining containment success. Terrain features such as valleys and ridges facilitated suppression operations, while steep slopes posed challenges. Additional personnel improved containment outcomes, though with diminishing returns in descriptive and predictive models. Tree canopy cover breaks enhanced suppression effectiveness, but with declining utility during windy conditions. Containment lines played a pivotal role, whereas the role of pre-identified containment features was context-dependent, likely influenced by broader strategic decisions.

Conclusions

Wildfire containment was influenced by multiple variables, and suppression strategies were situationally determined. Causal models provided valuable insights by isolating total effects of primary variables.

Implications

Findings underscore adaptive fire management strategies that incorporate context-specific information. Future research should integrate fine-scale weather metrics and additional fire behaviour drivers that guide effective decision-making during dynamic operations.