Carbon costs of different pathways for reducing fire hazard in the Sierra Nevada

Restoring a low-intensity, frequent-fire regime in fire-prone forests offers a promising natural climate solution. Management interventions that include prescribed fire and/or mechanical treatments have effectively reduced fire hazards in the Western United States, yet concerns remain regarding their impact on forest carbon storage. This study used results from a long-term, replicated field experiment to assess the impacts of a restored disturbance regime on carbon dynamics in a Sierra Nevada, mixed conifer forest. The carbon consequences of the treatments were compared to a dynamic baseline of untreated controls (Control). After 19 years of wildfire mitigation, all treated stands stored less carbon than Control, but a larger proportion was sequestered in wildfire-resistant pools (i.e., large trees or fire-resistant species). Notably, only the most intensive treatment regime—thinning, mastication, and prescribed fire (Mech+Fire)—became a net carbon source by Year 20 (−60 MgC/ha). Annual average net ecosystem productivity (NEP) in Control and prescribed fire-only (Fire, 5.6–5.8 MgC/ha/year) more than doubled that of the mechanical treatments (2.0–2.1 MgC/ha/year). Moreover, temporal trends diverged. By the 3rd post-fire interval, the live vegetation carbon accumulation stalled in Control (0.9 ± 1.0 MgC/ha/year, mean ± SE) and accelerated in Fire (6.6 ± 1.2 MgC/ha/year). In contrast, surface fuel recovery was initially faster in Fire but slowed significantly by the 3rd interval, suggesting that the increased productivity under a frequent-fire regime does not necessarily lead to rapid surface fuel buildup once the regime is established. A simulated wildfire in Year 20 killed 6×–16× more live tree carbon in Control (46% mortality). Still, Control maintained the highest post-fire carbon storage. Despite the inherent carbon costs of wildfire mitigation, our 20-year study highlights management pathways that minimize the trade-off between wildfire hazard and carbon storage in Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests.