Publications Library

Found 58 results
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is O  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
A
DellaSala DA. Accommodating mixed-severity fire to restore and maintain ecosystem integrity with a focus on the Sierra Nevada of California, USA Hutto RL, ed. Fire Ecology. 2017;13(2).
Miller C. Air-quality challenges of prescribed fire in the complex terrain and wildland urban interface surrounding Bend, Oregon O'Neill S, ed. Atmosphere. 2019;10(9).
Quaempts EJ. Aligning environmental management with ecosystem resilience: a First Foods example from the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon, USA Jones KL, O'Daniel SJ, eds. Ecology and Society. 2018;23(2).
Odion DC. Areas of Agreement and Disagreement Regarding Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer Forest Fire Regimes: A Dialogue with Stevens et al. Hanson CT, ed. PLOS One. 2016;11(5).
B
Doane D, O'Laughlin J, Morgan P, Miller C. Barriers to wildland fire use: a preliminary problem analysis. 2006.PDF icon rmrs_2006_miller_c001.pdf (45.97 KB)
Oliver M. A bird’s-eye view: Land-use planning and assessments in Oregon and Washington. (Gray A, ed.).; 2015. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sciencef/scifi172.pdf.
Olsen C, Sharp E. Building community-agency trust in fire affected communities in Australia and the United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2013;On-line early.
C
Olsen C, Shindler B. Citizen-Agency Interactions in Planning and Decisionmaking After Large Fires. 2007.PDF icon Decision-making after the fire.pdf (773.13 KB)
D
Holden ZA. Decreasing fire season precipitation increased recent western US forest wildfire activity Swanson A, ed. PNAS. 2018;115(36).
Wei Y. Designing Operationally Relevant Daily Large Fire Containment Strategies Using Risk Assessment Results Thompson MP, ed. Forests. 2019;10(4).
Charnley S. Diversity in forest management to reduce wildfire losses: implications for resilience Spies TA, ed. Ecology and Society. 2017;22(1).
E
Stine P. The Ecology and Management of Moist Mixed-Conifer Forests in Eastern Oregon and Washington: a Synthesis of the Relevant Biophysical Science and Implications for Future Land Management. PNW-GTR-897th ed. (Hessburg P, ed.). Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2014. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr897.pdf.PDF icon pnw_gtr897.pdf (8.07 MB)
O'Connor CD. An empirical machine learning method for predicting potential fire control locations for pre-fire planning and operational fire management Calkin DE, ed. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2017;26(7).
Spies TA. Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems White EM, ed. Ecology and Society. 2014;19(3).PDF icon ES-2014-6584.pdf (2.12 MB)
F
McGee TK. Facilitating knowledge transfer between researchers and wildfire practitioners about trust: An international case study Curtis A, ed. The Forestry Chronicle. 2016;92(2).
Kreye JK, Brewer NW, Morgan P, et al. Fire behavior in masticated fuels: A review. Forest Ecology and Management. 2014;314.
Littell JS, Oneil EE, McKenzie D, et al. Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington State, USA. Climate Change. 2010:30. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/wwetac/publications/littell_etal_2010.pdf.
Prichard SJ. Fuel Characteristic Classification System (FCCS) field sampling and fuelbed development guide. (Andreu AG, ed.). Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2019:77. Available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/58172.
Mclver JD. Fuel mass and stand structure 13 years after logging of a severely burned ponderosa pine forest in northeastern Oregon, U.S.A Ottmar R, ed. Forest Ecology and Management. 2018;424.
Martinson EJ, Omi PN. Fuel Treatments and Fire Severity: A Meta-Analysis. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; 2013:35.PDF icon 08-2-1-09_RMRS-RP-103WWW.pdf (9.05 MB)
McIver JD. Fuels and stand structure data for the Summit post-fire logging study: pre-logging, one year post-logging, and 13 years post-logging Ottmar RD, ed. 2015.
I
Fischer PA, Kline JD, Charnley S, Olsen C. Identifying policy target groups with qualitative and quantitative methods: the case of wildfire risk on nonindustrial private forest lands. Forest Policy and Economics. 2013;28.
Cannon JB. The influence of experimental wind disturbance on forest fuels and fire characteristics O'Brien JJ, ed. Forest Ecology and Management. 2014;330. Available at: http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/46459.
L
Moritz MA. Learning to coexist with wildfire Batllori E, ed. Nature. 2014;515.PDF icon nature13946.pdf (2.79 MB)
M
Oliver M. Mapping the Future: U.S. Exposure to Multiple Landscape Stressors. Portland: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2017.PDF icon scifi197.pdf (6.8 MB)

Pages