Publications Library

Found 1154 results
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
C
Dodson EK. Conifer regeneration following stand-replacing wildfires varies along an elevation gradient in a ponderosa pine forest, Oregon, USA Root HT, ed. Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;302.
Kane JM, Kerhoulas LP, Goff GS. Conifer encroachment increases foliar moisture content in a northwestern California oak woodland. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2023. Available at: https://www.publish.csiro.au/wf/pdf/WF22184.PDF icon Conifer encroachment increases foliar moisture content in a northwestern California oak woodland.pdf (1.1 MB)
Reisner MD, Grace JB, Pyke DA, Doescher PS. Conditions favouring Bromus tectorum dominance of endangered sagebrush steppe ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2013;On-line early.
Jain TB, Battaglia MA, Han H-S, et al. A Comprehensive Guide to Fuel Management practices for Dry Mixed Conifer Forests in the Northwestern United States. Fort Collins, CO: USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station; 2012:331. Available at: http://www.firescience.gov/projects/09-2-01-16/project/09-2-01-16_rmrs_gtr292web.pdf.
Jain TB, Battaglia MA, Han H-S, et al. A Comprehensive Guide to Fuel Management Practices for Dry Mixed Conifer Forests in the Northwestern United States. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; 2012:331. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr292.pdf.
Shaw DC, Beedlow PA, E. Lee H, et al. The complexity of biological disturbance agents, fuels heterogeneity, and fire in coniferous forests of the western United States. Forest Ecology and Management. 2022;525.PDF icon Shaw et al_2022_ForEcolMgmt_Complexity of BDAs fuels heterogenity and fire in conifer forests of West US.pdf (1.25 MB)
Huber CM, Fox DG, Riebau AR. A Compendium of Brief Summaries of Smoke Science Research In Support of the Joint Fire Science Program Smoke Science Plan. Clarkson, Western Australia: Nine Points South Technical Pty Ltd.; 2017:78p.PDF icon Summary Statements Booklet 21 April 2017.pdf (1.59 MB)
Walding NG. A comparison of the US National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) with recorded fire occurrence and final fire size Williams HTP, ed. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2018;27(2).
Weise DR, Johnson TJ, Myers TL, et al. Comparing two methods to measure oxidative pyrolysis gases in a wind tunnel and in prescribed burns. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2022;32. Available at: https://www.publish.csiro.au/wf/pdf/WF22079.PDF icon Comparing two methods to measure oxidative pyrolysis gases in a wind tunnel and in prescribed burns.pdf (2.65 MB)
Long JW, Drury SA, Evans SG, Maxwell CJ, Scheller RM. Comparing smoke emissions and impacts under alternative forest management regimes. Ecology and Society. 2022;27(4).PDF icon Long et al_2022_Ecol Society_Comparing smoke emissions and impacts under alternative forest management regimes.pdf (12.35 MB)
Thompson MP, Vogler KC, Scott JH, Miller C. Comparing risk-based fuel treatment prioritization with alternative strategies for enhancing protection and resource management objectives. Fire Ecology. 2022;18(26).PDF icon s42408-022-00149-0.pdf (3.88 MB)
Suzuki S, Manzello SL. Comparing particulate morphology generated from human-made cellulosic fuels to natural vegetative fuels. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2022;32. Available at: https://www.publish.csiro.au/WF/WF22093.PDF icon Comparing particulate morphology generated from human- made cellulosic fuels to natural vegetative fuels.pdf (2.77 MB)
Suzuki S, Manzello SL. Comparing particulate morphology generated from human- made cellulosic fuels to natural vegetative fuels. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2022;31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22093.PDF icon Suzuki and Manzello_2022_IJWF_Comparing particulate morphology generated from human-made cellulosic fuels to natural vegetative fuels.pdf (2.79 MB)
Iniguez JM, Evans AM, Dadashi S, et al. Comparing Geography and Severity of Managed Wildfires in California and the Southwest USA before and after the Implementation of the 2009 Policy Guidance. Forests. 2022;13(793).PDF icon Iniguez et al_2022_Comparing geography and severity of managed wildfires in CA and SW USA before and after 2009 policy guidance.pdf (1.64 MB)
Roloff GJ, Mealey SP, Bailey JD. Comparative Hazard Assessment for Protected Species in a Fire-Prone Landscape. Forest Ecology and Management. 2012;277:10. Available at: http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/31588/BaileyJohnForestryComparativeHazardAssessment.pdf?sequence=1.
Davis EJ, Moseley C, Evers C, et al. Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Oregon: A Profile of Organizational Capacity. Eugene, OR: Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon; 2012:20. Available at: http://ewp.uoregon.edu/sites/ewp.uoregon.edu/files/WP_39.pdf.
McCaffrey S. Community wildfire preparedness: a global state-of-the-knowledge summary of social science research. Current Forestry Reports. 2015;1(2).
Rappold AG. Community Vulnerability to Health Impacts of Wildland Fire Smoke Exposure Reves J, ed. Environ Sci Technol. 2017.
Ellison A. Community Experiences with Wildfires: Actions, Effectiveness, Impacts, and Trends. (Knapp M, ed.).; 2015. Available at: http://ewp.uoregon.edu/sites/ewp.uoregon.edu/files/WP_56.pdf.PDF icon WP_56-1.pdf (3.46 MB)
Copes-Gerbitz K, Dickson-Hoyle S, Ravensbergen SL, et al. Community Engagement With Proactive Wildfire Management in British Columbia, Canada: Perceptions, Preferences, and Barriers to Action. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 2022;5(829125).PDF icon Copes-Gerbitz et al_2022_Community Engagement with Proactive Wildfire Management in BC_Perceptions Preferences and Barriers.pdf (9.61 MB)
Nowell B. Communication under Fire: The Role of Embeddedness in the Emergence and Efficacy of Disaster Response Communication Networks Steelman T, ed. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2015;25(3).
Deser C, Knutti R, Solomon S, Phillips AS. Communication of the Role of Natural Variability in Future North American Climate. Nature Climate Change. 2012;2(11):5. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v2/n11/full/nclimate1562.html.
Santo AR, Huber-Stearns H, Smith H. Communicating with the public about wildland fire preparation, response, and recovery: a review of recent literature. Applied Environmental Education & Communication . 2022;21(4).
Santo A, Huber-Stearns H, Smith H. Communicating with the public about wildland fire preparation, response, and recovery. Ecosystem Workforce Program Working Paper. 2021;109.PDF icon WP_109.pdf (8.93 MB)
Santo A, Huber-Stearns H, Smith H. Communicating with the public about wildland fire: A resource for practitioners to plan engagement strategies. 2021.PDF icon Wildfire_Communication_Guide.pdf (494.3 KB)

Pages