Publications Library

Found 46 results
Filters: Keyword is prescribed burning  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
2
Melvin MA. 2012 National Prescribed Fire Use Survey Report. Coalition of Prescribed Fire Councils, Inc.; 2012:24. Available at: http://www.stateforesters.org/2012-national-prescribed-fire-use-survey-report.
Melvin MA. 2015 National Prescribed Fire Use Survey Report.; 2016:22 p.PDF icon 2015 Prescribed Fire Use Survey Report.pdf (6.93 MB)
A
Hallema DW. Assessment of wildland fire impacts on watershed annual water yield: Analytical framework and case studies in the United States Sun G, ed. Ecohydrology. 2016. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.1794/epdf.
Gregg RM. Available Science Assessment Project: Prescribed Fire and Climate Change in Northwest National Forests. (Behan J, ed.).; 2016:151.PDF icon ASAP_final_report_1 November.pdf (2 MB)
C
Long JW, Drury SA, Evans SG, Maxwell CJ, Scheller RM. Comparing smoke emissions and impacts under alternative forest management regimes. Ecology and Society. 2022;27(4).PDF icon Long et al_2022_Ecol Society_Comparing smoke emissions and impacts under alternative forest management regimes.pdf (12.35 MB)
D
van Mantgem PJ. Does prescribed fire promote resistance to drought in low elevation forests of the Sierra Nevada, California, USA? Caprio AC, ed. Fire Ecology. 2016;12(1). Available at: http://fireecologyjournal.org/journal/abstract/?abstract=266.
Price OF. The Drivers of Effectiveness of Prescribed Fire Treatment. Forest Science. 2012:12. Available at: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/saf/fs/2012/00000058/00000006/art00006.
E
McIver JD, McIver JD. Ecological effects of alternative fuel-reduction treatments: highlights of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate study (FSS). International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2012.
Knapp EE, Estes BL, Skinner CN. Ecological Effects of Prescribed Fire Season: A Literature Review and Synthesis for Managers. Redding, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station; 2009:80. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr224/psw_gtr224.pdf.
Noonan-Wright EK. The Effectiveness and Limitations of Fuel Modeling Using the Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator Vaillant NM, ed. Forest Science. 2014;60(2).PDF icon Noonan-WrightEt_2014_ForSci_CustomFuelModel.pdf (435.82 KB)
Kopper KE, McKenzie D, Peterson DL. The evaluation of meta-analysis techniques for quantifying prescribed fire effects on fuel loadings. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2009:24. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_rp582.pdf.
F
Filling in the Blanks for Prescribed Fire in Shrublands: Developing Information to Support Improved Fire Planning. Joint Fire Science Program; 2009:6. Available at: http://www.firescience.gov/projects/briefs/03-1-3-06_FSBrief63.pdf.
Allen I. Fire and Forest Management in Montane Forests of the Northwestern States and California, USA Chhin S, ed. Fire. 2019;2(2).
Twidwell D. First Approximations of Prescribed Fire Risks Relative to Other Management Techniques Used on Private Lands Wonkka CL, ed. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(10).
Peterson DL, Johnson MC, McKenzie D, et al. Forest structure and fire hazard in dry forests of the Western United States. Portland: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2005:30. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr628.pdf.
The Forest, the Fire and the Fungi: Studying the Effects of Prescribed Burning on Mycorrhizal Fungi in Crater Lake National Park. Joint Fire Science Program; 2009:12. Available at: http://www.firescience.gov/projects/briefs/03-3-2-05_FSBrief38.pdf.
Prichard SJ. Fuel treatment effectiveness in the context of landform, vegetation, and large, wind‐driven wildfires Povak NA, ed. Ecological Applications. 2020;online early.
Martinson EJ, Omi PN. Fuel Treatments and Fire Severity: A Meta-Analysis. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; 2013:35.PDF icon 08-2-1-09_RMRS-RP-103WWW.pdf (9.05 MB)
Prichard SJ. Fuel treatments and landform modify landscape patterns of burn severity in an extreme fire event Kennedy MC, ed. Ecological Applications. 2014;24(3). Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw_2014_prichard001.pdf.
H
Liu Z. Health and Environmental Impacts of Smoke from Vegetation Fires: A Review Murphy JP, ed. Journal of Environmental Protection. 2016;7.
I
R Martin A. Ignition patterns influence fire severity and plant communities in Pacific Northwest, USA, prairies Hamman ST, ed. Fire Ecology. 2016;12(1). Available at: http://fireecologyjournal.org/journal/abstract/?abstract=271.
Quinn-Davidson LN. Impediments to prescribed fire across agency, landscape and manager: an example from northern California Varner MJ, ed. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2012;21(3).
Kerns BK. The importance of disturbance by fire and other abiotic and biotic factors in driving cheatgrass invasion varies based on invasion stage Day MA, ed. Biological Invasions. 2017;19(6).
In a Ponderosa Pine Forest, Prescribed Fires Reduce the Likelihood of Scorched Earth. Joint Fire Science Program; 2008:11. Available at: http://www.firescience.gov/projects/briefs/04-2-1-85_FSBrief24.pdf.
Strahan RT. Increasing weight of evidence that thinning and burning treatments help restore understory plant communities in ponderosa pine forests Stoddard MT, ed. Forest Ecology and Management. 2015;353.

Pages