Publications Library

Found 68 results
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is M  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
M
Mulvey RL, Shaw DC, Filip GM, Chastagner GA. Swiss Needle Cast. Swiss Needle Cast Cooperative; 2013.PDF icon fidl-181.pdf (932.42 KB)
Mowery M, Punchard D. Land use planning approaches in the wildland-urban interface: an analysis of four western states. Community Wildfire Planning Center; 2021. Available at: https://www.communitywildfire.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CWPC_Land-Use-WUI-Report_Final_2021.pdf.PDF icon CWPC_Land-Use-WUI-Report_Final_2021.pdf (3.57 MB)
Moseley C, Davis EJ. Developing Socioeconomic Performance Measures for the Watershed Condition Framework. Eugene, OR: Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon; 2012:24. Available at: http://ewp.uoregon.edu/sites/ewp.uoregon.edu/files/WP_36.pdf.
Moritz MA. Learning to coexist with wildfire Batllori E, ed. Nature. 2014;515.PDF icon nature13946.pdf (2.79 MB)
Moritz MA. A Statement of Common Ground Regarding the Role of Wildfire in Forested Landscapes of the Western United States. (Topik C, ed.).; 2018:52. Available at: https://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/featured/fire-research-consensus.PDF icon WildfireCommonGround 2018.pdf (1.17 MB)
Moritz MA, Parisien M-A, Batllori E, et al. Climate Change and Disruptions to Global Fire Activity. Ecosphere. 2012;3(6). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES11-00345.1.
Morgan P. Vegetation Response to Burn Severity, Native Grass Seeding, and Salvage Logging Moy M, ed. Fire Ecology. 2015;11(2).PDF icon FireEcology031-1.pdf (3.01 MB)
Morgan P. Challenges of assessing fire and burn severity using field measures, remote sensing and modelling Keane RE, ed. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2014;23. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF13058.
Moote A. Closing the feedback loop: evaluation and adaptation in collaborative resource management. USFS, Sustainable NW, Forest Guild, National Forest Foundation, N. Arizona University, Watershed Research & Training Center; 2013:44.PDF icon Closing the feedback loop.pdf (1.03 MB)
Moore R, Casamassa G. Bioregional assessment of Northwest forests. Available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd762774.pdf.
Moody JA. Relations between soil hydraulic properties and burn severity Ebel BA, ed. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2015;Online early.
Monroe MC, Pennisi L, McCaffrey S, Mileti D. Social Science to Improve Fuels Management: A Synthesis of Research Relevant to Communicating with Homeowners About Fuels Management. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station; 2006:42. Available at: http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc267.pdf.
Mockrin MH. After the fire: Perceptions of land use planning to reduce wildfire risk in eight communities across the United States Fishler HK, ed. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020;45.
Mockrin MH. Recovery and adaptation after wildfire on the Colorado Front Range (2010-2012) Stewart SI, ed. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2016;25(11).
Miller C. Air-quality challenges of prescribed fire in the complex terrain and wildland urban interface surrounding Bend, Oregon O'Neill S, ed. Atmosphere. 2019;10(9).
Miller C, Ager AA. A Review of Recent Advances in Risk Analysis for Wildfire Management. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2012:14.
Miller C. Progress in wilderness fire science: Embracing complexity Aplet GH, ed. Journal of Forestry. 2016;114(3).
Millar CI. Temperate forest health in an era of emerging megadisturbance Stephenson NL, ed. Science. 2015;349(6250).
Millar CI. Historic Variability: Informing Restoration Strategies, Not Prescribing Targets. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2014;33.
Meyer MD. Principles of effective USA Federal Fire Management Plants Roberts SL, ed. Fire Ecology. 2015;11(2).
Metlen KL. Regional and local controls on historical fire regimes of dry forests and woodlands in the Rogue River Basin, Oregon, USA Skinner CN, ed. Forest Ecology and Management. 2018;430.
Merschel AG. Influence of landscape structure, topography, and forest type on spatial variation in historical fire regimes, Central Oregon, USA Heyerdahl EK, ed. Landscape Ecology. 2018;33(7).
Merschel AG, Beedlow PA, Shaw DC, et al. An ecological perspective on living with fire in ponderosa pine forests of Oregon and Washington: Resistance, gone but not forgotten. Trees, Forests and People. 2021;4.PDF icon An ecological perspective on living with fire in ponderosa pine forests of Oregon and Washington.pdf (9.05 MB)
Mendez SR, Carroll MS, Blatner KA, et al. Smoke on the hill: A comparative study of wildfire and two communities. Western Journal of Applied Forestry. 2003;18(1).PDF icon s10.pdf (51.71 KB)
Melvin MA. 2020 National Prescribed Fire Use Report. Coalition of Prescribed Fire Councils, Inc.; 2021.PDF icon 2020-Prescribed-Fire-Use-Report-1.pdf (4.52 MB)

Pages